FLASHBACK: FDR's attempt to 'pack the court' in 1937

FLASHBACK: Biden is silent now on court-packing stance, but in 1983 he called it a ‘bonehead’ idea

Biden said he was against court-packing 40 years ago but now the former VP won’t give stance on the issue.

Decades before President Biden established a commission to explore an expansion of the Supreme Court, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt made his own push to “pack the court” in the midst of the Great Depression.

Roosevelt pushed for Supreme Court reforms shortly after he won a landslide victory in the 1936 election. FDR had faced pushback from the judicial branch on elements of his “New Deal” legislation, a slate of programs that some argued were unconstitutional.

In 1937, Roosevelt proposed the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937. If approved, the bill would have granted the president the authority to appoint one additional Supreme Court justice for each sitting justice over the age of 70.

At the time, that would have meant that FDR could appoint six more justices. For a president seeking favorable court rulings on massive federal programs, the bill’s passage would have marked a major windfall.

Roosevelt’s plan was widely panned by both parties and drew little support in Congress. At the same time, the Supreme Court issued several favorable rulings on FDR-backed proposals, including the National Labor Relations Act and the Social Security Act.

FDR’s court-packing bill was eventually brought to a vote, which failed 70-22 in the Senate. By Roosevelt’s third term in office, he had appointed seven of the nine active Supreme Court justices.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

In 1983, Biden referred to Roosevelt’s failed bill as a “bonehead idea.”

The idea of expanding the Supreme Court drew renewed scrutiny in recent months as Democrats pushed to “pack the court” in response to the GOP’s confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Top Congressional Democrats are expected to unveil legislation to expand the Supreme Court by four justices on Thursday.

Source: Read Full Article